Articles

A proven path to higher and stable returns

0 Comments

The global equity markets have been very volatile and have understandably rattled investors confidence. The ‘winds of change’ to one of the longest bull markets have arrived and our portfolio safety metrics are being tested.

At TriDelta we set out to construct conservative portfolios designed to deliver in all market cycles for financial peace of mind.

Investors understandably remain nervous as year end approaches and we expect more volatility as concerns over the China trade deal, elevated market valuations and Brexit uncertainty. Other concerns include the inverted yield curve and rising interest rates that may stall any ‘Santa Claus’ rally this year.

At TriDelta Financial we come well prepared and deliver highly diversified portfolios that typically include a significant allocation to Alternative Investments that include global real estate and private debt.

Alternative investments are essentially any asset that is not a public stock, bond or cash security. Alternative investments often provide higher returns than traditional assets by focusing on less efficient or private asset classes, such as infrastructure and private equity.

They can generate stable, high levels of income by investing in private income oriented investments, such as real estate and private debt. Hedge Funds, such as Market Neutral Hedge Funds can also reduce volatility by using sophisticated hedging strategies.

We have long held the view that traditional equity and bond investment portfolios simply do not deliver consistent wealth accumulation. Portfolios require more diversification to ensure uncorrelated, multi-factor protection against downside risk. We manage our clients wealth in the same way pension funds do by strategically building portfolios that include a number of investment types and strategies.

We use stocks, bonds and preferred shares, but also include Alternative Investments such as global real estate, private debt solutions and hedge funds. Alternative investments compliment and add real value to portfolios by:

  • Provide high income
  • Diversification to reduce risk
  • Lowers portfolio volatility
  • Enhances returns
  • Protects capital during market weakness

The major pension portfolios are constructed in a very similar way. Here is an Extract from the CPP Investment Board 2018 Annual Report on how they diversify and reduce portfolio risk:

Diversifying sources of return and risk – the Strategic Portfolio

As noted, we manage the Investment Portfolio to closely match its total absolute risk with that of the Reference Portfolio. But that does not mean that we simply hold 85% of the Fund in equities, or even in equity-like exposures. This would be imprudent, as the portfolio’s downside risk would be almost completely dominated by a single risk factor – that of the global public equity markets.

We can, however, build a portfolio with a superior return profile for a similar amount of risk by blending a variety of investments and strategies that fit CPPIB’s comparative advantages. Each of these strategies offers an attractive return-risk tradeoff of its own, and their addition clearly reduces the dependence on public equity markets.

First, we can invest in a higher proportion of bonds and add two major asset classes with stable and growing income: core real estate and infrastructure. By themselves, these lower the risk of the overall portfolio. This risk saving then allows us to add a wide variety of higher return-risk strategies, such as:

  • Replacing publicly traded companies with privately held ones;
  • Substituting some government bonds with higher-yielding credits in public and private debt;
  • Judiciously using leverage in our real estate and infrastructure investments, along with increased investment in development projects;
  • Increasing participation in selected emerging markets; and
  • Making significant use of “pure alpha” investment strategies, which rely on the skills and experience of our managers.

CPP Investment Board 2018 Annual Report

To help put the current market turmoil into perspective, here are a few opinions from the large US investment firms:

JPMorgan Chase see the pessimism in equity and high-yield bond markets as overdone, as it sees only a 20% to 30% chance of a recession in 2019, with an increased probability in 2020.

The bank’s strategists, led by John Normand, analyzed equity valuations and credit spreads for high-yield bonds in the period leading up to past economic recessions.

The team continues to favor stocks over corporate bonds in developed markets and takes a neutral view on emerging markets.

“It is right to anchor portfolio strategy in a late-cycle framework that anticipates below-average returns into and through the next recession, but we note it is also excessively pessimistic to price so much downside now as equity and HG credit markets are doing,” the analysts wrote.

Goldman Sachs generally believes the bull market will continue in 2019, but it could get choppier as the year continues and investors begin to worry about a recession in 2020.

Here are some of the investment bank’s predictions for next year:
The S&P 500 will rise 5 percent to 3,000 by year-end 2019 (after closing 2018 at 2,850).
Investors should raise cash.
Investors should be defensive.
The market could be in for big trouble from tariffs.

Bank of America ML believes that “the long bull market cycle of excess stock and bond returns is expected to finally wind down next year, but not before one last hurrah.

Their Research team forecasts 2019 to deliver:
Modest gains in equities.
A weaker US dollar.
Emerging markets are cheap and under owned, they could be a big winner in 2019.
Higher levels of volatility.
A notable slowing in global earnings growth.

Morgan Stanley believes US stocks will underperform and Emerging Market stocks will outperform.

They see a number of macro changes as a result of slowing global growth in US and developed markets, rising rates, higher inflation and tighter policy. They believe these shifts will result in reversals of some key market sectors as follows:
US dollar strength will weaken once the Federal Reserve pauses on rate hikes.
US stocks outperformance will change to underperform.
US and European rates will converge.
Emerging markets have underperformed, but will retake the lead and outperform once China easing starts working.
Value portfolios will start outperforming growth.
Emerging market sovereigns will start outperforming US high yield bonds.

The TriDelta Approach:

TriDelta’s Alternative Assets Investment Committee focuses on putting the odds in our clients’ favour by focusing on:

  • Proven managers with strong track records and disciplined investment philosophies
  • Earning more stable returns
  • Generating premium yield in less liquid investments
  • Solutions that lower clients’ portfolio volatility

It is often difficult for investors to access these investments for three reasons:

  1. Alternative Investments are often restricted only to Accredited Investors (those with family income of $300,000+ or an investment portfolio of $1 million+)
  2. Many large Canadian financial firms simply do not make them available to their clients because alternative investments are often more complex and require a specialized skill set to analyze, review and select managers; and
  3. Many of the best alternative managers provide only restricted or limited access to their funds.

At TriDelta Investment Counsel, we solve all of these problems.

As an investment counsellor, we are able to offer these investments to all clients on a discretionary account basis. Alternative investments are a key element of our overall investment strategy.

Anton Tucker
Written By:
Anton Tucker, CFP, FMA, CIM, FCSI
Executive VP and Portfolio Manager
anton@tridelta.ca
(905) 330-7448

TriDelta Investment Counsel – Q1 2015 investment review

0 Comments

Executive Summary – Good times in the stock markets may last a while

16413399_s

Another quarter rolls by, and overall, it was another quarter of very solid returns for our clients. Can the good times for investment markets continue?
 
The pessimists of this world say “this has got to end soon”. The optimists say “maybe this is the new reality”. Our general view is that both are wrong. History teaches us that there are few to no “new realities” – eventually it repeats itself. At the same time, should we expect strong stock markets to end in the near future? We don’t think so.
 
Here are three reasons:

  1. Valuations are not unreasonable. The chart below is from JP Morgan based on the US S&P 500 index as of March 31, 2015. It shows current Price/Earnings ratios today as a percentage of the 20 year average of Price/Earnings ratios – so 100% would suggest things are at the 20 year average, 110% would be 10% over the average and 90% would be 10% under the average.
     

      Value Blend Growth
    Large 116.4% 104.3% 91.7%
    Mid 124.4% 118.1% 98.5%
    Small 114.3% 107.1% 97.4%

    This chart shows that while the overall market has a higher P/E ratio than the 20 year average, the higher valuation is skewed toward Value stocks, and in fact Growth stocks currently have valuations that are UNDER the 20 year average – especially among large companies. While this can provide some guidance for which types of names to buy in the market, it would suggest that on a purely valuation basis, despite several years of good markets, corporate earnings have mostly kept up. On its own, valuations would not drive us to lower our stock weightings.

  2. Rising interest rates should actually help stock markets. Over the past 52 years, a study of weekly stock market returns (S&P500) and 10 Year US Treasury yields, showed that when the Treasury yield was under 5%, there was a positive correlation between rising rates and stock market returns. Once the 10 year yields were over 5%, it became a negative correlation. Today’s 10 year US Treasury Yield stands at 1.9%.
     
    Based on this data, the next 3% of interest rate increases will actually correlate to a rising stock market. It is our view that this process will take a few years. When you consider that German 10 year bonds are trading at 0.15%, you realize that there still is room for US 10 year bond rates to decline from here. Even if there is no decline, at least rising rates will be constrained within this type of Global rate environment.
     
    There are a couple of reasons why stock markets would rise as interest rates climb. The first is that rising interest rates are often connected to growth in an economy, and if that growth is coupled with cheap money in the form of interest rates under 5%, it tends to be a good environment for stocks.
     
    The other reason might be that rising interest rates are not good for bond returns, and if that is coupled with bond yields under 5%, it tends to be a weak incentive to invest in bonds. If money doesn’t want to be in bonds, it tends to create inflows to stocks. If bond yields were 10%, but there were some capital losses, most people would still be comfortable holding bonds.
  3. Retirees are forced to invest in stocks at these interest rates. Today, a 65 year old couple has a 47% chance of at least one of them living to age 90. Essentially this means that 65 year olds need their money to last at least 25 more years – probably 30 years to be ‘safe’.
     
    If you have $1 million and GICs pay 8%, then they can spin off $80,000 a year and even with high inflation, you are in good shape.
     
    Today, retirees can invest it in GICs and it will spin off $18,000 if they are lucky. This means they would have to drawn down their savings each year to make ends meet. Can retirees afford to do that for 30 years?
     
    As a result, those with the largest portfolios (mostly those aged 65+), who used to have a much lower portion invested in stock markets, will need to be meaningfully invested in stocks (or high yield bonds) at least until they can get 4% or 5% on their GICs. That will take a while.

In the short term anything can happen. We fully expect there to be a 5% to 10% downturn at some point in 2015 because that happens most years. However, overall, we think that valuations, interest rates and demographics remain supportive for stock markets.

The Quarter that Was

The TSX had an OK start to the year, with a 1.8% return over the quarter. Of course, energy was down another 1.9% and financials were down 1.1%, but most of the smaller sectors helped to keep returns above water.
 
Declining crude prices continued to put pressure on energy stocks, but technically stocks are behaving well having put in what may be their low in December with higher highs and higher lows since then.
 
TSX earnings seem to have stabilized. Trailing 12 month corporate earnings numbers continue to fall, but the forward 12 month estimates have started moving up.
 
The Canadian financials have recovered from a very weak January where the index was down more than 8% on fears of a weaker Canadian economy (mainly Western Canada) and housing market.

The US S&P 500 was up just 0.4% in the quarter. But currencies added 9.1% for Canadian investors!!
In the US the best performing sector was Health Care, up 6.1%. The worst sector was Utilities, down 6.0%.
 
There was a very weak start in U.S. stocks on lackluster Q4 earnings where concerns over a strong dollar and slowing global growth were a recurring theme. This seems to have recovered somewhat.
Consumer sentiment has held up with the Consumer Confidence Index hitting a 7 ½ year high in January in the U.S.
 
Economic numbers were mixed with decent housing starts but weaker consumer spending, which may be somewhat related to the cold winter and heavy snowfall in the Northeast.
Earnings are stable as trailing numbers and forward estimates continue to rise.
 
With continuing drops in interest rates, bonds had a very good quarter, up 4.1%.
Global Central Bank policies continue to be the focus of headlines.
In Europe the ECB maintained a bias towards lowering rates and quantitative easing (governments buying their own bonds to keep rates low) in an attempt to keep their currency low and to stimulate growth.
 
In Canada, the Bank of Canada surprised with a 25 basis point rate cut on January 21st when no policy move was expected. The overriding concern is how Canada and its economy will deal with a US$50 a barrel environment for oil.

In the US, the Federal Reserve was quick to change its tone towards keeping rates steady instead of an expected increase. This was driven by deflationary concerns that came about from lower energy prices coupled with a strong US dollar.

How did TriDelta Do?

First quarter 2015 was very positive for TriDelta clients. Depending on risk tolerance/asset mix, most clients were up between 3% and 5.5% for the quarter, with the high growth oriented clients doing better, and the most conservative returning at the lower end of that range.
 
The TriDelta High Income Balanced Fund – was up 7.1% on the quarter.
 
The fund – which currently delivers a yield of over 7% – aims to provide income from diversified sources that include Global Bond yields, options, dividends and leverage. The fund is essentially a Global Balanced fund but we utilize a wide number of investment tools to achieve higher returns.
 
Some good regulatory news came through this quarter, which will allow all TriDelta clients the opportunity to own the fund (as opposed to only Accredited investors). This will come into effect in May and will allow for new investments as of the end of May.
 
Given a TSX return of 1.8%, we were very pleased with the results overall.
 
Our two biggest drivers for outperformance were:

  1. Between 30% and 40% of our stock weighting has been outside of Canada (U.S., Europe and Emerging Markets). Because of US currency gains and strong stock markets in Europe and Asia, these parts of the portfolio have done better than Canadian stock numbers.
  2. TriDelta has been significantly underweight energy, particularly with our Pension clients. In July we sold one of our two pure Energy stocks (Suncor), and bought the Pharmacy, Jean Coutu. To date, this trade has been a 40% swing to the positive. While we may find the value in Energy compelling at some point, for the most part, we find that our clients don’t want the volatility that comes with a high energy weighting, and we can find other industries and names that are more appropriate alternatives.

What worked well in Q1?

In our equity portfolios we continued to see the US$ working in our benefit. The leading performers had a US and technology slant with Avago Technologies and Apple leading the way.
 
Best Equity Performers – Core – Avago Technologies +31.0%, Fairfax Financial +18.9%, Moody’s +18.9%
 
Best Equity Performers – Pension – Apple + 23.7%, GlaxoSmithKline +22.1%, General Mills +16.9%
 
In the Bond and Preferred space, lower interest rates produced some nice winners.
 
Highway 407 6.47%, July 27,2029 bond was up 9.0% on the quarter as it benefits from a high yield and declining long term rates.
 
Brookfield Asset Series 18 preferred share was up 8.1% on the quarter.

What did not work well in Q1?

Before we talk details on what didn’t work, we have been asked by some industry colleagues “Why do you show people what didn’t work?” Our answer to that is simple:

  1. Transparency with clients is important
  2. It always helps an organization to review what isn’t going well
  3. It reminds everyone that even strong investment management returns include weak performers in a portfolio
  4. We like to be a bit different from the rest of the industry

This quarter, after the currency effect, Canadian stocks lagged the US (and most other world markets). Energy, Canadian Financials, and any business that seemed closely tied to Western Canada suffered.
 
Our weakest performing stocks were as follows:
 
Core – Michael Kors -4.3%, TransCanadaPipeline -4.3%, TD Bank -1.5%
 
Pension – Home Capital -10.9, ConocoPhillips -7.3%*, Corus Entertainment -6.5%
 
In the Core/Growth model, we still own all 3 of the weaker performers from this quarter. While we continually review our holdings for signs of problems, for now we are planning to continue to hold these names (always subject to change).
 
In the Pension model, we only continue to hold Home Capital. Its decline was largely based on fears of real estate declines and risk among non ‘A’ level borrowers. Home Capital is such a strongly managed company that has been able to work through much worse times than today, and we continue to like the name.
 
ConocoPhillips was actually sold on January 8th so we didn’t really participate in the losses for the quarter. Corus was sold (just in time) at roughly $22 on March 13th. It has since dropped 20%!
 
In the Preferred Share space, all rate reset preferreds (those that have dividends that will reset to a rate that is tied to the Government of Canada 5 year yield) had a very poor quarter. While we don’t see much in the way of increased interest rates in the very near future, we do believe that this sector of the market has been overly beaten up and is undervalued – and we may add to some beaten up names.
 
Cannaccord Series A 5.5% Variable was down 24.3% in the quarter, and represented our worst holding.
 
Its 5.5% dividend won’t reset until September 30, 2016, and at that time will reset at 3.12% above the 5 year Government of Canada yield, which today stands at just 0.6%, but could certainly rise in the next 18 months.

Dividend Changes in Our Portfolios

We continue to be pleased with a steady flow of dividend increases and no dividend cuts in our investment portfolios.
 
This quarter in our income oriented portfolios the top four dividend increases were:

Company Name % Dividend Increase Company Name % Dividend Increase
Canadian Utilities +10.3% Home Capital +10.0%
Potash +8.6% General Mills +7.3%

In our Growth portfolios, the overall dividend yields tend to be lower, but some of the trends of dividend increases have been very solid. Below are the four biggest percentage increases in the quarter:

Company Name % Dividend Increase Company Name % Dividend Increase
Sherwin-Williams +21.8% Moody’s +21.4%
3M +19.9% Magna +15.8%

What do we see in the Quarter Ahead

  • More volatility by sector – you won’t see as much of the overall market moving higher or lower as much as a few sectors pushing much higher or lower.
  • Interest rates remaining mostly stable to lower in Canada and Europe. The United States won’t likely see the Fed raising rates this quarter, but we still expect to see it this year.
  • Oil looks to have found a base from a technical perspective and may allow for some trading gains, but we can’t see any big move forward as long as oil inventories keep pushing new heights. We believe it will be a lot of ‘one step forward, one step back’.
  • Canadian dollar remains under some pressure, but seems to have found some support in the 78 to 80 cent range unless Oil makes a major move from here in either direction or there is another Bank of Canada rate cut.

Summary

TriDelta Financial is celebrating its 10th Anniversary this month and we are very thankful to our clients for helping us to reach this milestone.
 
We are planning to do a couple of special client thank you events in the coming year to celebrate – details to follow.
 
Enjoy the soon to be realized Spring!!

TriDelta Investment Management Committee

Cameron Winser

VP, Equities

Edward Jong

VP, Fixed Income

Ted Rechtshaffen

President and CEO

Anton Tucker

Executive VP

Lorne Zeiler

VP, Portfolio Manager and
Wealth Advisor

When to Invest in the Market?

0 Comments

One of the most frequent questions posed by clients concerns whether now is a good time to invest in the equity markets.   As the last two months reminded us, even during a bull market, pull backs are quite common.  In fact, on average, the stock market experiences a 10% or greater decline almost once per year and smaller declines of 5% or more 2-3 times per year.  No one wants to put new money into their portfolio only to see it go down in the short-term, but generally the bigger risk is having money sit on the sidelines uninvested.  While equity markets can experience large declines (2008-2009 is the most recent example), historically, they have earned over 9% per annum, while cash has only earned roughly 3.5% [1].

14498871_sTherefore, when we are asked the question whether now is a good time to be invested in equities, we typically respond YES it is (although the percentage allocation will vary by each client and their circumstances).   A recent report from Charles Schwab’s Center for Financial Research titled “Does Market Timing Work” confirms this view. [2]  The author, Mark Riepe, examined the returns for five different types of investors (listed below) who each received $2,000 at the beginning of every year over a 20 year period ending in 2012.  The individuals were:

Peter Perfect, who had great market timing ability and managed to invest the $2,000 each year at the S&P500’s lowest monthly closing value.

Ashley Action, who invested her full $2,000 each year at the earliest possible moment.

Matthew Monthly, who divided the $2,000 into equal monthly allotments.

Rosie Rotten, who had the opposite luck of Peter Perfect; she invested her funds each year at the monthly market peak value.

Larry Linger, who could not determine when to invest in the market, so he chose to keep his funds in cash (using Treasury bills as a proxy) every year.

Fast forward to the end of the 20 year period and the results may be somewhat surprising.  While equity markets were substantially higher at the end of 2012 from 1992, this period did include two bear markets (2000-2002 and 2008-2009) and many corrections of 10% or more.  Even Rosie Rotten who had horrible market timing, investing at each year’s monthly peak, still managed to earn a strong return.

Peter Perfect had the highest closing value, turning his $40,000 of investments ($2,000/yr. over 20 years) to $87,004.  Ashley Action earned the next most at $81,650.  Matthew Monthly fared well with $79,510.  Even Rosie Rotten still ended up with $72,487, a gain of over 80% on her capital.  The only real loser was Larry Linger who saw his $40,000 only grow to $51,291.

The more important point of the article is that these results were consistent across nearly all time periods analyzed.   The author analyzed 68 rolling 20 year periods beginning in 1926 (prior to the Great Depression) and in over 85% (58 out of 68) of those periods, the results were the exact same (Peter performed best, followed by Ashley, Matthew, Rosie and Larry was last). 

Of the 10 periods that did not follow this normal pattern,  Ashley Action never finished in the bottom. Instead she still finished second 4 times, 3rd 5 times and 4th once.  In fact, Ashley Action who invested her funds immediately, had the second best return of the pack 91% of the time and was third or better in 98.5% of all rolling 20 year periods.  Larry Linger, by contrast only finished in first or second twice, in the periods 1955–1974 and  1962-1981.  He earned the lowest return in 91% of all time frames.

Equities have historically provided the highest returns among traditional asset classes, but with significantly more volatility.  While, investment advisors and counsellors can never guarantee results, nor can they always determine the best time to invest in the market, but at TriDelta Investment Counsel, we suggest that all long-term investors have an allocation to equities in their portfolios.  As the report suggests, we prefer the odds of Ashley Action and Matthew Monthly achieving their financial and retirement goals much better than those of Larry Linger.



[1] http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/datafile/histretSP.html.  Returns on S&P500 from 1928-2013 had a geometric average return of 9.55%.  3-month T-bill average return was 3.55%

[2] For a copy of the report by Schwab Center for Financial Research, please go to: http://perspective.schwab.com/mobile/article/7510/Does-Market-Timing-Work.

 

Lorne Zeiler
Written By:
Lorne Zeiler, MBA, CFA
VP, Wealth Advisor
lorne@tridelta.ca
416-733-3292 x225

TriDelta Q3 2014 Investment Report – Keeping the faith when the news is bad

0 Comments

Executive Summary

5186232_s1Last quarter, our message was that Q3 is historically a positive quarter, but not as strong as Q1 and Q4. The message was also that we should expect to see our recent string of 1%+ monthly returns come to an end. Well it took until September, but it did indeed come to an end.

As the bad news from around the world seems to keep coming in, and people’s fears for the market escalate, TriDelta remains fairly confident in North American stock markets as we head into the fourth quarter. This isn’t because we are ‘fiddling while Rome is burning’. It is because:

  • corporate earnings remain strong
  • interest rates remain low (more on that further in our commentary)
  • the US economy is growing
  • you can buy BCE stock and get a 5.1% dividend that will grow every year or you can get a 5 year GIC at 2.5% that will not grow (and will get taxed more in a taxable account).

We recognize some of the challenges in the market and world, and are watching them closely but a big part of our job is to try to separate the meaningful information from the short term noise. For now, we believe that the meaningful information is telling us that stocks remain a better investment option than bonds or cash.

Two other notes on the month and quarter ahead. Only once in the past decade has a negative September been followed by a negative October on the Canadian and US stock markets. Of course, we all remember 2008 (sorry for reminding you).

As a final point, the broad US based S&P 500 has had a great run since March of 2009. However, within that run, the market has dropped 5%+ 11 different times, and each time has rebounded quite quickly and advanced further. As of this writing, for all of the noise, the S&P 500 still isn’t down 5% from its peak for a 12th time. While the TSX and other areas of the world were down more, the point is that these pullbacks are very normal, and we believe this is one more of them.

The Quarter that Was

The quick summary is decent numbers for bonds, a little weak for stocks, very weak for emerging markets, metals and mining and smaller cap stocks.

After a drop of 4.3% on the TSX in September, Toronto stocks ended the quarter down 1.2%.

The DEX Bond Universe saw a loss of 0.6% in September, and a quarterly gain of 1.1%.

Preferred shares saw small quarterly gains in the 0.5% range.

Both the S&P500 (US) and the MSCI World Stock Index had losses in September, and had similar quarterly returns with small gains of 0.6% and 0.4% respectively.

Currencies played a role in the quarter with the US dollar appreciating strongly against most world currencies and also to the Canadian dollar. Greater exposure to US dollar investments helped Canadian investor returns on the month. For example, while the S&P 500 was down 1.4% last month in US dollars, it was in fact up 1.6% on a Canadian dollar basis – for a 3% swing on currency.

How did TriDelta Clients Do?

Fortunately, most TriDelta Financial clients had a decent quarter.

Conservative clients did very well – with most up 1.5% to 2.5% on the quarter.

Growth clients were a little weaker – most were flat to slightly down on the quarter.

The reason that conservative clients did better was two-fold. Bonds and preferred shares outperformed most sectors of the stock market for the quarter, but within the stock market, large cap, dividend payers (outside of metals and mining) had solid returns, and these are the types of stocks that TriDelta owns in our Pension style portfolios. Of course, owning Tim Horton’s in Pension portfolios also helped.

Even in September, as the TSX was down over 4%, most of our Conservative clients (who are up between 8% and 10% on the year to date), kept September returns to a loss of less than 1%.

Over the long run Growth clients should outperform, but so far in 2014, our Conservative clients have seen better returns.

 

TriDelta High Income Balanced Fund

Some clients who are accredited investors ($1 million+ in investment assets or $300,000+ in household income or $200,000+ in personal income), have been able to invest in the TriDelta High Income Balanced Fund. This pooled fund aims to deliver high yields, and broad diversification, through stocks, options, and low cost leverage of bonds. Year to date the fund has returned just under 10%, and has been in the top decile (top 10%) of all balanced income funds in Canada. In Q3, the fund was up 0.7%. We are very pleased with the performance of the fund so far this year.

Pending legislation changes may mean that the Fund could be available to all non-accredited investors soon. We will keep you posted as soon as this change comes into reality.

Positive Dividend Changes Continue

We continue to pay close attention to dividend growing stocks. We believe that this is a strong part of long term, lower volatile investment success. Again this quarter we are pleased to say that there were no dividend declines, and the list of seven dividend growers are as follows:

Company Name % Dividend Increase Company Name % Dividend Increase
Home Capital +12.5% Emera +6.9%
Conocophillips +5.8% Royal Bank +5.6%
McDonalds +4.9% Verizon +3.8%
Bank of Nova Scotia +3.1%

The Quarter Ahead

10884799_sWe believe that interest rates are one of the biggest drivers of the market today, and the better handle we have on future interest rates, the better we will manage your overall portfolio. In summary, we believe that short term rates will rise in the US in late 2015, but only by a small amount. We believe that short term rates in Canada likely will track those of the U.S. – perhaps with some lag. We believe that long term rates in the US and Canada will remain fairly volatile, but could in fact move lower.

The basic message being that meaningful interest rate rises are unlikely to take place and that this helps guide our investments in two ways.

The first is that this will help the stock market as growth is encouraged by low borrowing costs.

The second is that long term bonds are a reasonable investment as well, and are not to be feared.

Here are 6 items driving our view of interest rates:

  1. “Everyone” thinks interest rates are going higher, but the market seems to be telling us something different. This can most easily be seen in the 10 year bonds in virtually all Western countries that have seen meaningful declines in 2014 – most notably in Europe.
  2. Yes it is true that Quantitative Easing will end by the end of this year, but US long term interest rates have actually fallen during most of the months that the US government has been reducing its bond buying. The noise about the end of Quantitative Easing has upset the market, but the reality is that long term interest rates may come down further from here. Don’t get caught up in the noise.
  3. Short term rates in the US are going to rise in 2015 – but it will likely be so small that it won’t make much of a difference? Fed Funds Futures currently give a 75% chance that the first US rate hike will be around September 2015 (still almost a full year away). There is a 50% chance of a second hike of 25 basis points (0.25%) by the end of 2015. IF both happened it would move the US Fed Funds rate from 0.25% all the way to 0.75%. This would mean that in 12 to 15 months, the US Fed Funds rate will still likely be at close to historical lows.
  4. Geopolitical risks (Russia, ISIS and Hong Kong) are providing a safe haven trade into bonds – especially in the US and Canada. This flood of funds into bonds is keeping interest rates low.
  5. As the largest debtor nation in the world, the United States doesn’t want to have to pay more on their own debt. Just like you want your mortgage rate to be low, imagine how much a country with $18 trillion of debt would like to have low interest costs!
  6. Household debt levels are significantly greater now than before the financial crisis. If the US Fed hikes rates prematurely, there is a risk of a recession.

Summary

While you don’t want to sift investment decisions down to a couple of numbers, we do feel that today, interest rates play a bigger predictor of future stock market returns than they have in a long time.

Fortunately for us, our view is that long term rates in particular, will be supportive of higher equity markets, particularly in the U.S., for the period ahead. Corporate earnings remain very important and have been largely positive of late, but we believe that low interest rates will also be key to continued earnings growth.

As an aside, investment markets tend to perform better from October to March than the 6 months that have just past. Let’s hope that trend continues.

May we all enjoy the beautiful fall colours that Canada provides, and remember to take time to be thankful for the good in our lives.

 

TriDelta Investment Management Committee

 

Cameron Winser

VP, Equities

Edward Jong

VP, Fixed Income

Ted Rechtshaffen

President and CEO

Anton Tucker

Executive VP

Lorne Zeiler

VP, Wealth Advisor

 

 

Why We Own Stocks

0 Comments

With the equity market sell-off at the beginning of August, investors have been reminded once again that there is risk to investing in the stock market, but before hitting the panic button, it is worthwhile to review why we suggest allocating at least part of your portfolio to equities and why stocks are still likely to offer the best total return over the medium to long-term.

While some people have called the stock market a casino or worse, investors need to be reminded that each share of stock represents a fractional ownership of a business. When you buy shares of Apple, Pfizer, BCE or TD Bank, you are becoming a fractional owner in those enterprises. The value of that business is based on the future earnings and cash flow that those companies generate. Buying shares of good companies at a reasonable price has been and likely will continue to be one of the best methods of building long-term wealth.

The main reason that people have bought equities is to generate higher returns in their portfolio. This is called the Equity Risk Premium (ERP). The ERP represents the additional return that investors have earned owning equities over other asset classes. Historically, equities have provided a 4% higher return than bonds1 per year. If the investment is in a taxable account, that premium is even higher as equities generate capital gains and dividends, both of which are taxed at much lower rates than bonds (interest income). Please note though that the 4% premium is an average, meaning in some years the benefit will be much greater than 4% and in other years equities may earn a lower return than bonds or a negative return.

Inflation Hedge: While bonds offer security – a fixed coupon payment from issue to maturity date as long is there isn’t a default, investors bear inflation risk. This is the risk that if inflation increases, the fixed coupon payments from the bonds will have a lesser value, because these cash flows will not be able to buy the same amount of goods and services, i.e. have less purchasing power.

1727060_sSince equities are public companies, typically when inflation rises, these companies find ways to continue generating higher profits by raising prices and /or cutting costs. E.g. if inflation rises, Walmart, McDonald’s, Royal Bank and TransCanada Pipelines typically find ways to continue increasing profits (and potentially dividend payments to shareholders) through changes in pricing or cost cutting measures, thereby protecting the investor’s purchasing power.

Participate in Economic Growth: While economies do experience contractions from time to time, typically Gross Domestic Product (GDP) increases over time. As the economy expands, so should earnings of quality public companies (equities). Historically, these companies will generate more in sales and be able to increase prices during periods of economic expansion, and be able to reduce costs during periods of economic weakness, which should lead to higher earnings per share (EPS). Higher EPS typically leads to higher stock prices and often to higher dividend payments over time. In short time periods, particularly recessions, equity prices may decline even if earnings rise, but on a long-term basis, equities have been one of the best ways for investors to benefit from economic growth.

Low Interest Rates: While interest rates are expected to rise in the first half of 2015, we expect the increases to be small initially and the pace of the increases to be slow. Low interest rates benefit equities in a few ways: 1) relative attractiveness – institutions and individuals need to put their investment dollars somewhere. When interest rates are low, the relative attractiveness of stocks, particularly those that pay a dividend, is greater, i.e. when your choices are investing in a GIC paying less than 2%, and a government bond paying less than 2.5%, investing in stock that pays a 3% dividend and offers the potential for capital gains is quite appealing. 2) enhanced earnings – with low interest rates, companies need to devote less of their revenues to debt payments, which enhances profit margins and overall earnings. Higher earnings typically leads to higher stock prices. 3) Share buyback – many companies are using their savings on debt costs to buy back their shares on the market. If the number of shares outstanding decreases and earnings remains relatively the same, earnings per share (EPS) improves as well. From Q2 2013 to Q2 2014, U.S. companies bought back approximately 3.3% of their shares outstanding2; these share repurchases increased earnings per share.

While we do not expect equity returns similar to 2013 or 2014 in the year ahead, we still expect equities to outperform other asset classes in 2015. Because of their many benefits, equities should remain a key part of each investor’s portfolio over the long-run.

The overall percentage of equities to own in an investment portfolio, and the type of equities to hold (large capitalization vs. small capitalization, developed market vs. emerging market) are best determined by meeting with a trusted investment counsellor and /or financial planner. A trusted planner reviews their clients’ income and cash flow needs as well as taxes to determine the clients’ needed rate of return. An investment counsellor analyzes investments to determine the best return prospects relative to each investor’s willingness and ability to take risk in his investment / retirement portfolios.

 

[1] http://www.seeitmarket.com/quantifying-equity-risk-premium-13202/. Quantifying Equity Risk Premium, Allan Millar, January 30, 2013. Based on S&P500 Index return vs. U.S. Government and Corporate Bond Indices. Data set from Ibbotson 1926-2010.

[2] http://www.factset.com/websitefiles/PDFs/buyback/buyback_6.18.14. FactSet Quarterly Buyback S&P500, June 18, 2014.

 

Lorne Zeiler
Written By:
Lorne Zeiler, MBA, CFA
VP, Portfolio Manager and Wealth Advisor
Lorne can be reached by email at lorne@tridelta.ca or by phone at
416-733-3292 x225
Cameron Winser
Written By:
Cameron Winser, CFA
VP, Equities
Cameron can be reached by email at cameron@tridelta.ca or by phone at
416-733-3292 x228

TriDelta Investment Counsel – Q1 2014 investment review

0 Comments

Executive Summary

After strong investment markets in 2013, there were some real questions about valuations heading into 2014.

At least for the beginning quarter of the year, we remained fully invested and leaned a little aggressively. This has paid off as the quarter was quite positive for stocks (more so for Canada than the US). Even bonds and preferred shares had a bit of a rebound, continuing some of their gains from the last quarter of 2013.

The question remains whether to take a little bit off the gas to defend against a potential pullback or to continue to move fully forward.

Read More

↓